Corrections

When The Hype Check gets something wrong, the correction is date-stamped, attributed, and added to the original article. Each correction also lands on this page in reverse-chronological order so the public record is complete.

• Factual error in a published article: wrong number, name, date, quote, or attribution.
• Misattribution of a claim to a person or organization that did not make it.
• Source link that breaks, paywalls past the cited disclosure, or is later retracted.

• Editorial judgment changes after re-reading the evidence. We write a follow-up article and name what changed.
• New information that emerges after publication. We publish an update, not a correction.
• Disagreement about interpretation. We engage in the next article, not in a silent edit.

A correction adds a date-stamped note at the top of the original article, in this format:

Corrected YYYY-MM-DD: what was wrong, what it now reads, and the source that triggered the change.

The article body stays intact below. Nothing is silently rewritten.

• 2026-05-31

  What Buyers Actually Said: cluster #2 collapsed two distinct PwC announcements (May 5 PwC-OpenAI, May 14 PwC-Anthropic) into one and missed the named operational metrics published on May 14. The corrected, asymmetric verdict is in the follow-up piece: PwC's Second Announcement Had the Metrics, My First Verdict Missed Them. The rest of the baseline stands as the May 30 snapshot.

Email fabio@correax.com or message via linkedin.com/in/fabiocorrea. Include the article URL, the specific claim, and the source that contradicts it.